From d16e82d468eb0d5bb1e662ac4812c0ca6fc0fc64 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Yaroslav Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2020 14:47:03 +0300 Subject: reorganized repo to be easier to use with GNU stow; added script to stow --- .../.vim/autoload/neomake/makers/ft/racket.vim | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 32 insertions(+) create mode 100644 dotfiles/.vim/autoload/neomake/makers/ft/racket.vim (limited to 'dotfiles/.vim/autoload/neomake/makers/ft/racket.vim') diff --git a/dotfiles/.vim/autoload/neomake/makers/ft/racket.vim b/dotfiles/.vim/autoload/neomake/makers/ft/racket.vim new file mode 100644 index 0000000..fc7145a --- /dev/null +++ b/dotfiles/.vim/autoload/neomake/makers/ft/racket.vim @@ -0,0 +1,32 @@ +" vim: ts=4 sw=4 et + +function! neomake#makers#ft#racket#EnabledMakers() abort + return ['raco'] +endfunction + +" This is the same form of syntax-checking used by DrRacket as well. The +" downside is that it will only catch the first error, but none of the +" subsequent ones. This is due to how evaluation in Racket works. +" +" About the error format: raco will print the first line as +" :: +" Every successive line will be indented by two spaces: +" in: +" context...: +" ::: +" The last pattern will be repeated as often as necessary. Example: +" foo.rkt:4:1: dfine: unbound identifier in modulemessage +" in: dfine +" context...: +" /usr/local/Cellar/racket/6.5/share/racket/pkgs/compiler-lib/compiler/commands/expand.rkt:34:15: loop +" /usr/local/Cellar/racket/6.5/share/racket/pkgs/compiler-lib/compiler/commands/expand.rkt:10:2: show-program +" /usr/local/Cellar/racket/6.5/share/racket/pkgs/compiler-lib/compiler/commands/expand.rkt: [running body] +" /usr/local/Cellar/minimal-racket/6.6/share/racket/collects/raco/raco.rkt: [running body] +" /usr/local/Cellar/minimal-racket/6.6/share/racket/collects/raco/main.rkt: [running body] +function! neomake#makers#ft#racket#raco() abort + return { + \ 'exe': 'raco', + \ 'args': ['expand'], + \ 'errorformat': '%-G %.%#,%E%f:%l:%c: %m' + \ } +endfunction -- cgit v1.2.3